By Like Bob Dylan’s prophetic The Times They Are A-Changin’, the global political landscape faces a seismic shift as Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House in January 2025, triggering an unprecedented wave of diplomatic repositioning worldwide.
Originally released in 1964, Dylan’s song emerged during a period of social upheaval, civil rights struggles, and anti-establishment movements – a time when the old guard clashed with new visions for the future.
Today, the echoes of Dylan’s lyrics resonate as political realignments, economic uncertainty, and shifting global alliances define the modern era.
Just as Dylan urged senators and congressmen to “please heed the call,” today’s leaders are confronted with rising populism, geopolitical tension, and public demand for systemic change.
Trump in the Oval Office, the beating heart of the free world, contests every element of the liberal international order – trade, alliances, migration, multilateralism, democratic solidarity and human rights.
Nations are recalibrating their policies to align with or counterbalance US strategies, reflecting Dylan’s timeless assertion that “the wheel’s still in spin.”
Even Trump himself has acknowledged the unprecedented nature of these developments, recently admitting in Paris that “the world seems to be going a little crazy now.”
European allies plan 40,000-strong peacekeeping force amid uncertainty
In what may prove to be the most significant restructuring of European security since NATO’s formation, European powers are quietly developing plans for a 40,000-strong peacekeeping force in Ukraine.
This initiative, spearheaded by Poland, Germany, and France, represents the first serious attempt to create a European security framework independent of US leadership.
The plan, drawing inspiration from the post-war division of Korea, envisions stationing troops along a future demarcation line in Ukraine.
Key architects include Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, probable future German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and French President Emmanuel Macron, who have been meeting privately to coordinate this unprecedented security initiative.
Mark Rutte, NATO’s new chief, captured the pragmatic approach European leaders are adopting when he stated,
We have to dance with whoever is on the dancefloor.
This sentiment reflects the delicate balance European leaders must strike between maintaining trans-Atlantic ties and developing independent security capabilities.
Military aid gap reveals 45% dependence on non-EU equipment
The European Union’s military preparedness has come under intense scrutiny, with outgoing EU foreign service head Josep Borrell revealing troubling statistics about the bloc’s defense capabilities.
According to Borrell, 45% of military equipment provided to Ukraine by EU nations originated from outside the bloc, highlighting a critical dependency on external suppliers.
“I have been begging for arms,” Borrell stated in a candid assessment of the situation.
He pointed out that while Russia maintains a firing rate of 800,000 rounds monthly, the EU’s bureaucratic processes are so cumbersome that it took three months just to request one million rounds of ammunition.
This disparity has raised serious questions about Europe’s ability to support Ukraine independently of US assistance.
Middle Eastern realignment sees Saudi Arabia pursue a 60% increase in Chinese trade
The Middle East is witnessing a dramatic realignment of traditional alliances, with Saudi Arabia leading a strategic pivot away from exclusive reliance on US security guarantees.
The kingdom has significantly increased its engagement with China, targeting a 60% increase in bilateral trade, while simultaneously pursuing normalization with Iran.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s description of Israeli actions in Gaza as “genocide” marks a significant departure from the kingdom’s recent warming of relations with Israel.
Saudi diplomats have explicitly stated that normalization with Israel is “off the table without a clear pathway to a Palestinian state,” effectively pausing the expansion of the Abraham Accords.
Israel signals major policy shift with West Bank annexation plans
The implications of Trump’s victory have reverberated strongly in Israel, where cabinet member Bezalel Smotrich made the stunning announcement that “2025 will be the year of Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria.”
This declaration, coming within a week of the US election results, signals potential plans for West Bank annexation that were previously considered diplomatically impossible.
The timing of this announcement is particularly significant as it coincides with Netanyahu’s claims of having held three post-election conversations with Trump, during which he says they “see eye to eye on the Iranian threat in all its components.”
This alignment of Israeli and American leadership positions has created deep concern among Gulf states and threatens to further complicate regional diplomatic efforts.
China positions for leadership amid 50% proposed US tariff threat
Beijing has launched a sophisticated diplomatic campaign to position itself as a stabilizing force in contrast to perceived US unpredictability under Trump.
Despite facing the threat of 50% tariffs, China is actively promoting itself as a reliable partner committed to free trade and green energy, particularly in Europe and the Global South.
The situation has become more complex with Trump’s threat to impose 100% tariffs on BRICS countries if they attempt to replace the US dollar as the global reserve currency.
This aggressive stance has paradoxically strengthened China’s ability to present itself as a more predictable economic partner, particularly among developing nations seeking alternatives to US-dominated financial systems.
European nations face strategic choices as Ukraine support wavers
European leaders are grappling with unprecedented decisions regarding Ukraine’s future, faced with the prospect of diminishing US support.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s recent proposal for a ceasefire plan represents a significant shift in strategy, focusing on diplomatic rather than military means to regain territory lost since 2014.
The proposal, coupled with a request for immediate NATO membership for remaining Ukrainian territory, reflects the growing uncertainty about continued US backing.
However, NATO leadership, including Rutte, has rejected this proposal, arguing that neither Russia nor the US would accept Ukrainian NATO membership under current circumstances.
This rejection highlights the complex calculations European leaders must make as they balance their support for Ukraine against their own security interests and relationship with the United States.
Defense industry constraints show 65% capacity shortfall
The European defense industrial base has revealed critical weaknesses, with Borrell’s analysis showing a 65% capacity shortfall in meeting current military requirements.
This industrial limitation has severely hampered the EU’s ability to support Ukraine militarily and raised serious questions about Europe’s capability to act independently of US support.
The situation is further complicated by bureaucratic delays and coordination challenges among EU member states.
Industry experts estimate it could take 3-5 years to achieve the necessary production capacity, even with significant investment and political will.
Trump signals potential Iran negotiations amid regional tensions
Despite his tough campaign rhetoric, Trump has indicated a surprising openness to negotiations with Iran, revealing that he had been prepared to make a deal “within one week after the election” had he won in 2020.
This suggestion of a more nuanced approach to Middle Eastern politics has created both uncertainty and opportunity in regional diplomatic circles.
The possibility of US-Iran negotiations has particular significance given the broader regional realignment occurring in the Middle East.
Saudi Arabia’s normalization of relations with Iran and the increasing influence of China in the region create a complex diplomatic environment that could either facilitate or complicate potential US-Iran talks.
Global implications and future scenarios
The international community’s response to Trump’s return appears to be creating new patterns of alliance and cooperation that could outlast his presidency.
European nations are particularly focused on developing independent security capabilities, while Middle Eastern powers pursue multi-directional diplomacy to hedge against uncertainty in US policy.
These shifts suggest a potentially permanent change in global power dynamics, with traditional US allies seeking greater autonomy and alternative partnership frameworks.
The success of these initiatives will largely depend on their implementation during Trump’s presidency and their ability to create sustainable alternative security and economic arrangements.
LSE Professor Fawaz Gerges provides a comprehensive assessment of the situation:
“Saudi Arabia, one of the most important Middle Eastern powers dependent on the US, is positioning itself for the Trump administration by diversifying its foreign policy, deepening its relations with China and normalizing with Iran.”
Early days of Trump’s return will be crucial
The coming months will be crucial in determining whether these preparatory moves develop into lasting changes in the international order.
European defense initiatives, Middle Eastern diplomatic realignments, and China’s positioning as a stable alternative partner will all face practical tests as Trump’s presidency begins.
The success or failure of these various initiatives could determine whether Trump’s presidency marks a temporary disruption to the post-World War II international order or a permanent shift toward a new global power structure.
The stakes are particularly high for traditional US allies, who must balance their historical relationships with America against the need to develop independent capabilities and alternative partnerships.
The post The times they are a-changin: How the world readies for another Trump presidency appeared first on Invezz
